to the Wonder

to-the-wonder-water

Terrence Malick is a controversial film maker.  For every person who likes his films, there are probably ten who don’t.  Or more.  I don’t know.  To the Wonder is the most recently released and by far most impressionistic (well, of what I’ve seen).  Malick loves to show without telling.  To suggest without confirming.  To question without necessarily finding the answers.  Which is problematic for a lot of people.  People who like to be shown.  Told.  Given answers.  But the truth is, there are probably no definite answers; and if there are, they can’t be served up on a platter but must be discovered for themselves.

to-the-wonder

Okay, so back to the film.  Ben Affleck and Olga Kurylenko fall in and out of love.  Rachel McAdams is there.  Javier Bardem is a priest struggling to experience God in a kind of tangible way.  It’s all voiceover, otherwise the dialogue is sparse.  We see that they’re in love but we don’t know how they came to be there.  We see them fight but mostly don’t know about what.  And the truth is, I don’t think that people really know these things.

To-The-Wonder-upstairs-downstairs

I’m going to say this straight up.  I LOVED this film, but I don’t think you should watch it.  Or if you do watch it, go in knowing what you’re going to get.  Which is visual poetry.  Without narrative, without context.  This will not be easy.  Most of the best films never are.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: